The agile metrics reflect progressive learning for the team. Usually, metrics help in analyzing the current situation of the organization while gaining insight over the changing attributes. The agile metrics resonate change while opening avenues for better opportunities.
In this article at Atlassian Agile Coach, Dan Radigan elaborates on the positive aspects of five agile metrics that may help in keeping track of the team’s progress within the development cycle.
Metrics Rooted in Speed
The author suggests keeping track of both agile and business metrics. Agile may help in measuring different aspects of development, while the business metrics help in addressing market needs. The agile metrics enable the team to keep focus towards software delivery by helping them understand the development process better.
Be it a scrum team or Kanban, the agile metrics help in mapping the project or program goals. It accounts for the success criteria for each product requirement by its end users. Here is a list of agile metrics suggested by the author:
- Sprint Burndown: In this, the scrum teams develop a time-sensitive sprint and predict the extent of work they can cover during the sprint. The sprint burnout report tracks the work being covered during the sprint. However, this implies proper tracking of the work being done or to ensure that the teams are not faking it to fill their timesheets. It is productive for short-term goals as it hinders learning and improvement process during the project.
- Epic and Release Burndown: It helps in tracking detailed projects comprising individual sprints along with the epics and versions. It is feasible for both Kanban and scrum teams. The scope creep or function creep helps in filling further requirements in the project as the initial requirements extend. With the project progress, the project owner may take a call over keeping or removing the team members from a specific project considering their learnings out of it.
- Velocity: It is the calculation of average work finished by the scrum team in one sprint, measured in hours or story point. The product owner can predict the speed of the team’s work using backlog of their previous predictions. Observing time is an efficient and flexible approach to scale the team’s processes, giving them an advantage of further adjustments, if needed.
- Control Chart: It aims to focus on the period of work-in-process until it is done. It is feasible for teams taking shorter cycle time like Kanban as well as optimized cycle time for scrum teams. The ultimate objective is to have a steady yet reduced cycle time, irrespective of the nature of the work.
- Cumulative Flow Diagram: It is one of the vital resources for Kanban that helps in ensuring consistent workflow across teams. It showcases blockages and shortcomings while ensuring limits for already in-process work.
The author further claims that good metrics are not limited to these five. To deliver quality work, the agile teams can switch to outdated yet productive metrics. The metrics help in measuring the team’s performance while they head towards achieving goals. Using quantitative and qualitative feedback may drive change. To gain in-depth knowledge of agile metrics explained by the author using the bar graphs, click on the following link: https://www.atlassian.com/agile/project-management/metrics